Art

The Illusion of Clarity

Lately, I’ve been thinking a lot about certainty—how it's expressed, how it's used, and how it feels in a time when almost nothing is stable. My recent work revolves around declarative language—statements like “Yes!,” “No!,” and “Absolutely!”—the kind of language that demands authority and leaves no room for doubt. These phrases are everywhere in our culture, especially in political and commercial messaging. They’re designed to make us feel sure, aligned, convinced. But what happens when we start to question that certainty?

In the studio, I’ve been developing a subsidies of my text works that examine these types of statements not just as words, but as objects with weight—visual, spatial, and conceptual. I intend for these works to eventually exist as an installation. I fragment and recontextualize them and plan to paint them directly onto walls in large-scale formats that confront the viewer head-on. The work intentionally plays with readability and space, forcing moments of misreading and hesitation. The result is a kind of friction between what the eye sees and what the mind believes—a tension that reflects how language can simultaneously reveal and obscure meaning.

The political undertones are unavoidable. We’re living through a time when language is increasingly weaponized to distort truth and polarize discourse. Certainty has become both a tool and a trap—something we cling to, but also something that can be imposed upon us. By using visual language stripped of nuance yet open to interpretation, I want to explore that contradiction: the desire for clarity in a world that refuses to be pinned down.

These pieces aren't meant to provide answers. They are designed to sit in the space between conviction and confusion, inviting viewers to consider how language shapes not just what we think, but what we assume we know. In that space, I hope to make room for something far more valuable than certainty: reflection.

The Center of Culture

Brooklyn is the center of culture. At least in relationship with Manhattan, a borough structured around financial power, order, and institutional influence. My experiences working across New York City have further shaped this perspective. As a teacher in outreach programs throughout Brooklyn’s neighborhoods, I have engaged with the borough’s diverse communities, witnessing firsthand its spirit of reinvention and resistance. At the same time, I have designed and remodeled apartments for wealthy communities throughout Manhattan which has provided me insight into the mechanisms of exclusivity and capital that define the city’s power structures. These dual perspectives have grounded my understanding of the larger dynamics at play—how Brooklyn exists in a constant negotiation with the financial and political forces emanating from across the river.

The contrast between Manhattan’s rigid structures of capital and the fluid, adaptive nature of Brooklyn’s creative and communal spaces mirrors my own artistic interrogation of language, meaning, and disruption. Brooklyn thrives on flux. Its layered visual language—graffiti-covered walls, independent storefronts, and spontaneous street interactions—offers a counterpoint to Manhattan’s polished, commercialized narratives of power. My work engages with this tension, exposing how systems of authority, communication, and knowledge shape the everyday, and how moments of the surreal and absurd can disrupt those structures.

By reimagining the mundane and playing with the instability of language, my practice reflects Brooklyn’s evolving identity—caught between its working-class roots, artistic experimentation, and the encroaching forces of gentrification and commodification. Much like the borough itself, my work seeks to challenge the hierarchies imposed by capital, offering new ways of seeing and engaging with the structures that define urban life.